Analysis of the group "Lost Boys"
 |
 |
Comments:
SAMPLE OUTPUT
PROANA ANALYSIS OF THE GROUP "LOST BOYS"
Interaction Process Analysis Nonpatterned Process Analysis
Period Period
1 2 3 T 1 2 3 T
Peter 22 34 23 79 0 0 0 0
Michael 17 29 13 59 0 0 0 0
Wendy 20 38 15 73 4 6 4 14
John 16 32 24 72 0 0 0 0
TinkerBel 9 23 17 49 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 84 156 92 332 4 6 4 14
Analysis indicates that the discussion was reasonable balanced
The following line(s) of communication were not used during period 1
Wendy ------- TinkerBel
John ------- TinkerBel
The following line(s) of communication were not used during period 2
The following line(s) of communication were not used during period 3
Period 3 shows that a clique group developed between Peter and John
Period 1 perceived leader for
Peter Micheal Wendy John TinkerBel
Wendy Peter Wendy Peter
Period 2 perceived leader for
Peter Micheal Wendy John TinkerBel
Wendy Peter Wendy Micheal
Period 3 perceived leader for
Peter Micheal Wendy John TinkerBel
TinkerBel John Peter TinkerBel
Analysis indicates that Peter was the procedural leader
Comments:
The group, "Lost Boys" was meeting to discuss the problem of how to outsmart Captain Hook and his men. Peter Pan seemed to have the most current information about Hook and the rest of the pirates. The other group members tended to perceive him as their leader. The pattern of interaction confirmed that.
I noticed some tension between Wendy and Tinker Bell. They rarely spoke to each other and did not make eye contact at all.
