NS4H Honors Assignments, Fall 2002
- Honors Assignment 1: The fictional detective, Sherlock Homes,
was made famous by Arthur Conan Doyle. Holmes was known for his powers
of deduction. Please visit
http://www.thinkingcoach.com/holmes/holmesdetail.php
and read the exchange between Holmes and his faithful partner Dr. Watson
from The Adventure of the Blue Carbuncle. Does Holmes use inductive
or deductive logic when determining the nature of the person under observation?
Explain.
- Honors Assignment 2:
Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions, by Edwin A. Abbott, A
Square, 1884, may be viewed in an electronic version at
http://www.alcyone.com/max/lit/flatland/
You will want to read the first few sections to get the flavor of this
allegory. Then jump ahead to section 15, "Concerning a Stranger
from Spaceland," and explain how the author, a Square, perceives
the Stranger, and builds a model of what he may be like from his observations.
Then write a paragraph about how we might try to explain our three-dimensional
universe expanding into four-dimensional space. (Recall my demonstration
using a balloon with dots on its surface.) (due Monday, 23 Sept 2002)
- Honors Assignment 3:
In the September 11, 2002 issue of Newsweek, an Argument by Analogy
is made using an example from physical science that might be spectacularly
inappropriate. Read the article at
http://www.msnbc.com/news/801476.asp
(yes, it is the one with you-know-who on a horse)
and examine the argument that uses a supernova as an analogy. You can
click to jump down to the Complete Story, then scroll down past some
Talk forms to find the rest of the article on the page. You will probably
need to find out how supernovas work by doing a little digging on the
web. (I found a really good site in about two minutes, courtesy of an
agency of NASA.) Write a paragraph or two on how well this analogy works
and bring it to class for credit and discussion. Be sure to cite your
sources. [Hint: Distinguish between how a supernova forms when a star
of suitable mass goes dark in its core, and a supernova remnant that
exists much later.] (due Monday, 23 Sept 2002)
- Term Paper Topics:
I have recommended that the Honors Class should concentrate on the area
of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for term paper topics.
CAM is threatening to go mainstream, both for possible carreer choices
and for government funding, in spite of a lack of scientific foundation
for most of the claims of CAM. Issues are not just of science, but also
of politics and individual belief systems. For background see:
- The White House Report
on Complementary and Alternative Medicine, an analysis
of this report may be found at the Quackwatch website.
- The AAAS has suggested
that young scientists look at careers in CAM. See the link
originally referenced on this site under Hot Off the Web.
- Honors Assignment 4.
In Moore chapter 4, Application 4.1, you are asked to generate hypotheses
regarding Preacher Explodes. That is pretty hard to do, given that we
have no background in the subject of Spontaneous Human Combustion. Consider,
if you will, the following two websites: one by a well-known skeptical
writer, the other from the opposing camp. Read both accounts, then generate
a list of hypotheses from this material. We will evaluate these hypotheses
using the methods of Hypothetical Reasoning as we learn more about the
hypothetico-deductive method.
http://www.csicop.org/si/9611/shc.html
http://www.alternativescience.com/spontaneous-human-combustion-burning-issue.htm
Be alert. The writer of the Alternative Science website is no push-over.
He is very good at constructing compelling arguments. (due Friday, November
8, 2002)
- Honors Assignment 5. Moore Chapter 4 has some problems involving
the use of the term Null Hypothesis. Read the description at the following
web site
Don't
Believe in the Null Hypothesis? by Chong Ho Yu, Ph.D.
then rewrite the argument about fibromyalgia given on page 145 of Moore's
book. You may also wish to consult the Philosophy Pages about modus
tollens. There appears to be a violation of Transposition
in the argument as it appears. [Hint: Ignore the references to The Null
Hypothesis, and concentrate on the Statement "q will be true if
and only if p is true, where p is the disease and q the results from
the test." ] (due Friday, November 8, 2002)
- Honors Assignment 6. It is fashionable in some quarters to
treat Science as just another belief system which we can choose or not
when interpreting how the world works. Read the editorial in the December
2002 issue of Scientific American, In
Science We Trust. Then write a one or two page paper contrasting
the self-correcting nature of science with that of "alternative"
belief systems which generally start with an ideology, then show how
the world is explained by it. If you feel that this is an unfair characterization,
then defend that point of view. Choose at least one ideology with which
to make your contrast. (Due Wednesday, December 9, 2002.)
|