Chapter 10
Corrections Organization and Operation
GENERAL FEATURES:
Two subsystems:
Two types of supervision:
TWO PHILOSOPHIES to CORRECTIONS
Two philosophies can conflict
Corrections departments-traditionally closed system
resulting in suspicion and distrust from outside.
Reality: Corrections
has an external impact and must
interact with/be responsive to outside forces
ADMINISTRATOR:-develops policy-highly political
Can be used as scapegoat in highly politicized environment-
No job security-serves at will
MANAGERS-implement policy
REVIEW SAMPLE RANK STRUCTURE in Textbook
California Dept of Corrections
PRISONS AS ORGANIZATIONS
DEVELOPMENT AND STATUS OF INMATE
CIVIL LITIGATION
PRISONER LITIGATION
Increase from 218 in 1966 to 16,741 in 1981.
in 1996 64,000 petitions filed
Successful Law suits-benefitial impact on staff
Review the Federal
Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996
which attempts to address the problem of frivolous lawsuits.
US SUPREME COURT CASE INVOLVING PRISONERS
Procunier v. Martinez: 416 US 396, 1974 -mail censorship and client/attorney
priviledge issue for paralegal/law students' interviews of inmates.
Successful Law suits-benefitial impact on staff
Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996
"The overwhelming majority of prisoner
cases, especially civil rights
cases filed by state prisoners in federal district
courts pursuant to
42 U.S.C. §Ê1983, are filed pro se
and in forma pauperis (IFP).
Thus, an effective case-management plan for prisoner
civil rights cases
must focus on court practices for processing IFP suits.
Because the majority of prisoner civil rights complaints
are decided
on the pleadings and disposed of without trial,
most of the administrative
burden this litigation imposes on the district
courts results from the
initial screening and pretrial processes."
PLRA provisions can be sorted into
six basic categories:
criteria for
case screening and dismissal;
requirements
for achieving IFP status;
provisions
affecting the management of cases;
limitations
on relief;
sanctions;
and
attorneys’ fees.
I. Case-Specific Procedures for Facilitating Effective Management
of Prisoner Litigation according to the
The original and complete document linked above discusses
procedures
for the following decision points in managing a prisoner
civil rights action:
determining IFP status and the appropriate filing fee ordering service of process determining whether a claim or complaint should be dismissed handling mandatory exhaustion of administrative remedies determining whether and how to provide counsel managing cases that survive the initial determination regarding frivolousness determining sanctions to deter abusive prisoner litigation setting out appeal rights in final orders and IFP proceedings on appeal. A. Procedures for determining IFP status and the appropriate filing fee.
Regardless of a prisoner’s ability to qualify for IFP status, as
explained below, new section 1915(g) precludes granting such status
to any prisoner who has had three prisoner actions dismissed in federal
court as frivolous or malicious, or for failing to state a claim on which
relief could be granted, unless the prisoner is in imminent and serious
physical danger.The prisoner’s affidavit must “include a statement of all assets
such prisoner possesses.”31 In addition to the affidavit, the prisoner
must file “a certified copy of the trust fund account statement . . . .
for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the
filing of the complaint.”
Highlights include the following:
In the year ending June 30, 2002, the number of inmates in custody in local
jails rose by 34,235; in State prison by 12,440; and in Federal prison by 8,042.
At midyear 2002, a total of 3,055 State prisoners were under age 18. Adult jails held a total of 7,248 persons under age 18.
At midyear 2002, there were 113 female inmates per 100,000 women in the United States, compared to 1,309 male inmates per 100,000 men.
From: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/pjim02.htm
Changes in Prisoner litigation since 1996
House Introduces Crucial Prison Litigation Reform Legislation
Prison Litigation and What It Means To You as a Corrections Professional
PRISONER LITIGATION IN THE INTERNET AGE