INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON COURTS
Juries Judges Attorneys Prosecutors

Differences:

FRANCE: role of judicial police in criminal investigation, including authorization of searches, etc.

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS in some countries are considered prosecutorial assistants

Juries-many countries in form of lay judges

Role different from American jurors

Role of Victim in civil law countries-can hire own private prosecutor

LEGAL TRAINING in Europe

LAWYER: Variations in training depending on career choice

AUTHOR: Legal studies in civil law tradition insufficient for practice of law in court
(What are the requirements to practice law in the U.S.?)

Studies are general and interdisciplinary

Graduates required to undergo practical training

US law school graduates is expected to do legal work with minimal help

Depending on exam scores-civil law graduates choose:

Private lawyer

Judge

Government lawyer

Prosecutor

Legal scholar

Reputation and status of lawyers in civil law countries higher than in US

Germany-graduates intern to help them in chosing option

England-bifurcated system

Barristers vs. Solicitors

Private and Public Prosecutors-civil law systems

Prosecution:

US-public prosecutors with minor differences in AR, KY, NC, TN in misdemeanors

In non-adverserial systems of justice the attorneys play a more passive role

FRANCE: procurator, examining magistrates,

Counsel for indigent

LATIN AMERICA:

“ACCESO A LA JUSTICIA Y EL ‘DERECHO DE INTERÉS PUBLICO’”

Judges and Lawers have poor reputation.

Counsel for indigent available in most countries

Rural areas not well served

Assigned counsel

Lawyers appointed by judge from attorneys in area serving without pay

Lawyers paid by state (Argentina, Brazil, Peru, Paraguay)

Chile gives money to bar association to finance judicial assistance service

Law school legal assistance clinics

The adjudicators

US-different from rest of world with election of most judges

'
FINLAND

Nordrheinwestfalen-Ehrenamtliche Richter
Above documents will be translated in class

Vorschlagsliste-Sample solicitation for lay judges

Generally-Europe-wide standard for compensation of lay judges and/or jurors

Traveling costs

Compensation for loss of wages/earnings

Basic subsistence stipend

(In GB-specific mention of reimbursement for child care)

Sample differences in age requirements for jurors or lay judges:

25-63 in Finland

18-69 in UK

26-69 in Bavaria, Germany

Suitability similarly determined around Europe

Citizenship or registered voter

UK has the common law system of justice and uses the 12 person jury

Interesting provision in UK
Separate areas for prayer and quiet thought in some courts.
In UK nearly ALL persons must serve

In Finland:

Office-holders in the general courts or the prison service, public prosecutors, attorneys, enforcement officials, criminal investigators, customs and police officers may NOT serve as lay judges.

In UK jurors typically serve at the most 2 weeks

In Germany and Finland-no more than 12 days per year

Finnish District Court compositions (depending on type and difficulty of case)
Single legally qualified judge (cases with fine or imprisonment not to exceed 18 months)
Legally qualified judge and a panel of Lay Judges (more serious criminal cases and some civil cases)
Three legally qualified judges (Most difficult civil cases with no Lay Judges assigned)

IN UK

Crown Court-equivalent of California Superior Court-handles serious criminal cases such as murder, rape, assault, burglary or fraud.

High Court or County Court-civil case and lower level criminal cases

Explaining the Responsibility of the Juror

Compensation for Jurors (internal)

Court structure and levels

Read about the Seal of Approval for Government agencies-the Charter Mark

Question: Is the compensation for American jurors adequate?

Justice of the Peace in U.S.

Justice of the Peace in Australia-Northern Territory